4. Injections

Not only covid-19 injections, but all anti-viral vaccines and drugs, are founded on a so far unproven viral thesis. What is then the logic behind products purporting to kill unidentified viruses, in other words supposed to cure by addressing an unproven cause?

At the very least this should raise concern. Hence it is worth understanding what these injections are, beyond the logic on which they are based, being obscure. To do so, it is first necessary to know what a vaccine actually is. It is defined by the CDC as “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease.”[1] The Marriam-Webster dictionary adds that it is “an antigenic preparation of a typically inactivated or attenuated pathogenic agent … or one of its components or products (such as a protein or toxin)”.[2] Antigens should not be confused with antibodies. The former “are substances or toxins in your blood that trigger your body to fight them,” – the fight being what is called an immune response – while antibodies lock on to their specific antigens”, eventually killing them and stopping infection”.[3] Vaccines are supposed to induce antibodies. This is the thesis. However, it has been noticed that for many diseases, as remarked in the Koch Institute Bulletin of Epidemiology, “the antibody concentration does not allow any conclusion to be drawn about a possibly existing cellular immunity”.[4] Beyond this fact, the basic question is: when a virus remains unidentified, it logically defies the mind what are being defined as antibodies, against what?

This already enables us to make more precise our original question: what is the attenuated pathogenic agent present in anti-viral vaccines since no virus has never been identified? Is it an exosome secreted by our cells, which it could very well be? In that case, are vaccines in effect teaching our body to fight the very particles it produces to help us heal?

Regarding covid-19 injections, they act at a genetic level in a novel way and may be introducing a whole new set of problems. They are not vaccines since they either introduce a strand of synthetic RNA or a double-stranded DNA into a human being. Hence they do not consist of an inactivated or attenuated toxin and are not meant to stimulate the immune system to provide immunity, but through instructions contained in these molecules to stimulate the body to produce a viral spike protein, i.e. the full-fledged toxin itself the immune system is supposed to fight. It is merely hoped that hen somehow instead of harming, the toxin will stimulate the immune system to fight it successfully. Whether this will happen of not is not known. Hence these injections do not conform to the definition of vaccines and are experimental products.

Besides, DNA vaccines contain strong adjuvants, with their own issues. As for the mRNA ones, as explained by Dr Gatti,[5] because the RNA introduced is considered to be sort of, but not quite like our own, it is thought that the sensors over our cell membranes can recognise them as foreign bodies and thus prevent them from entering cells. Hence to force their entrance, a trick similar to that of the Trojan horse is used: they are enveloped within organic nanoparticles, and indeed liposomes are listed among the contents of the covid-19 injections. Liposomes are not recognized by the sensors and hence they are phagocytized (ingested) inside the cells. Once inside and the fatty membrane is degraded, they release RNA or DNA. The problem is this genetic material could then combine with other cellular compounds, resulting in new entities. However, we do not know whether we have safety mechanisms to eliminate these entities from cells, in particular whether exocytosis, the process which releases exosomes (see section I.3) is capable of doing so. In the future, nanoparticles may well have important applications in medicine, but for the moment we have little understanding of “how organisms, cells, tissues react to the presence of nanoparticles, i.e. foreign bodies whose behaviour is still largely unknown”.[6]

This would be bad enough if there truly was a toxin identified. However, in the case of the particles named Sars-Cov-2, only DNA fragments have been observed. Not only do we not know what they are part of, nearly all of them are a perfect match with human DNA. So could the injections act against the human body itself but at a more critical level than anti-viral vaccines, identifying its own DNA as belonging to a toxin? If the “spike proteins” are part of exosomes or other particles produced by our cells (see Addendum), then what indeed is the body being goaded to react against?

The point is we little know the consequences of these new experimental products, all more so as they are founded on fragments matching human DNA. The RNA and DNA introduced may interfere with the natural human DNA,[7] in which case it is not possible to know what will happen. “At best, nothing. Otherwise, anything unthinkable and unimaginable can happen not only to the current generation but to the later ones as well.”[8]

In short, can we honestly affirm that we have any proper understand of how that which is conceptualized as a microscopic gene acts on the whole and is acted on by the whole, i.e. the macroscopic human being, and of its interactions with the innumerable parts of the whole? Even Henri Poincaré who desperately tried to hold on to the notion of objectivity in science was wary about such extreme reductionism:

“We seek reality, but what is reality? The physiologists tell us that organisms are formed of cells; the chemists add that cells themselves are formed of atoms. Does this mean that these atoms or these cells constitute reality, or rather the sole reality? The way in which these cells are arranged and from which results the unity of the individual, is not it also a reality much more interesting than that of the isolated elements … If you are present at a game of chess, it will not suffice, for the understanding of the game, to know the rules for moving the pieces. … this knowledge will truly have very little value. … To understand the game is wholly another matter….”[9]

Is it in any way prudent to actually put into practice this reductionist perspective and act on human life at its most basic level? This question is all the more relevant when injections and drugs are aimed at a cause that has not been properly assessed. Could they not then in effect be contributing to the prevalence of the disease they are supposed to combat? The example of Tamiflu has already been mentioned.[10]

Moreover, no reliable independent study of the contents of the covid-19 injections has been conducted. Hence all information comes from the listed ingredients. In 2017, Drs Gatti and Montanari had found that numerous vaccines, including many influenza ones as well as those systematically given to children, “contain non biocompatible and bio-persistent foreign bodies which are not declared by the Producers, against which the body reacts in any case.”[11] Is this also true of these injections?

Whatever the answer may be, according to microbiologist Sucharit Bhakdi, the systematic study of two German doctors on their respective patients show that injections induce blood clots in more than 30%.[12] This awaits confirmation. A more widespread study involving doctors worldwide is ongoing, but all-cause mortality data so far does not corroborate this. Thrombosis had already increased in 2020 after some years of decline.[13] For 2021, no analysis is yet available. It may take time for blood clots to translate into fatal thrombosis and thus for this data to display correlation with vaccination rates.

What do trial results tell us? Their evaluation follows the current method for estimating efficacy. Moderna injections for example are reported to achieve about 94% efficacy. This figure is based on 196 volunteers supposed to have contracted covid-19, 185, i.e. 1.23%, from a control group of 15,000, and 11, i.e. 0.07%, from the injected group of also 15,000.[14] This evidently is meaningless since the PCR tests are irrelevant and we do not know what disease they showed symptoms of, given covid symptoms encompass those of a large class of diseases. Still, assuming they showed some of those symptoms, common sense tells us that the reduction, or efficacy is about 1.23-0.07=1.16%, whereas 94% corresponds to 185/196. The latter does not reflect any reality, especially as it is independent of the number of trial volunteers, namely were their numbers multiplied by any powers of 10 and the same number of infections occurring. For instance, for 1,500,000 with the commonsensical method we would get 0.0123% in the control group, and 0.0007% in the injected one, giving an efficacy of 0.0116%, whereas we would still find 94% with the method used. In short, the latter method boosts phenomenally the semblance of efficacy. Besides, about 2 to 3% of those injected showed side effects, which are among the symptoms of the supposed covid-19. So this gives about 300 to 450 in the injected group. Hence in actual fact we have many more showing symptoms than in the control group. The same likely holds for the other injection trial results. Besides, trial volunteers could not have been monitored long, given the speed at which the injections have been commercialized. Hence their mid to long term effects do indeed remain unknown.

Hence, Prof. Bhagdi’s worldwide ongoing study is critical. It will provide an uncontroversial answer regarding the prevalence of one possible side-effect, blood clotting, especially as it will ensure the absence of this issue before injection. However, it is only one possible side-effect. The only way to know whether the injections are having a severe harmful effect on the vaccinated as well as their descendants is to make it mandatory for each death to mention whether the person received the covid-19 injection or not, and whether any of their direct ancestors did or not. Each year the death toll should be reviewed. If it proves to be noticeably higher among the injected and their descendants than among those who are neither injected, or the descendants of anyone who has, then it would be a clinching proof that indeed the injections are highly dangerous. Otherwise, we will be able to put our fears to rest that although they certainly are futile, given no virus has been identified, at least hey are harmless.

The main point nonetheless remains: given this non-identification, what are they about?

  1. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/imz-basics.htm
  2. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/vaccine
  3. https://www.healthline.com/health/infection/antigen-vs-antibody#antigen
  4. https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/Infekt/EpidBull/Archiv/2012/Ausgaben/30_12.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
  5. https://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/IJVV-04-00072.pdf
  6. Gatti, A. M. and S. Montanari. 2008. Nanopathology: The Health Impact of Nanoparticles. Singapore: Pan Stanford.
  7. https://telegra.ph/Vaccines-That-Can-Destroy-Our-Genetic-Material-10-22
  8. Personal email from Dr. Saeed Qureshi
  9. Poincaré, H. 1907. The Value of Science . Translated by G. B. Halsted. New York: Science Press.
  10. https://www.rxlist.com/tamiflu-side-effects-drug-center.htm
  11. https://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/IJVV-04-00072.pdf
  12. https://www.wochenblick.at/bhakdi-impf-nebenwirkungen-bei-mehr-als-30-bestaetigt-und-bewiesen/
  13. https://www.heart.org/en/news/2020/08/17/after-years-of-decline-death-rate-from-lung-clots-on-the-rise
  14. https://www.statnews.com/2020/11/30/moderna-covid-19-vaccine-full-results/